Client case
Building Trust in FinTech & Crypto
Services Provided
Venture building
CHALLENGE
A FinTech fund specialising in cryptocurrency was growing slowly. It asked us for more blog views, but the real problem was trust: in a market full of hype, visitors had no way to check the fund’s claims, so they read, doubted and left.
APPROACH
We combined quantitative and qualitative data to find out why visitors hesitated, generated ideas for building trust and prioritised them by expected impact. The two winners went live within three months: an interactive calculator that shows what an investment would have returned, and a landing page with the fund’s real historical performance.
OUTCOME
Visitors stayed longer, used the calculator and were more likely to leave their details. The performance page became a lead generation tool, and perception of the fund shifted from scepticism to engagement.
Share
In most markets, more content builds more trust. In crypto it often does the opposite: every fund publishes bold articles, so one more article reads like one more promise. This fund came to us with a clear request (more blog views) and a business that was growing more slowly than its results deserved.
The challenge
The fund had real expertise and a real track record, but visitors had no way to see it. Messaging was general, the claims sounded like everyone else's, and nothing on the site let a sceptical visitor check them. Traffic was not the bottleneck. Belief was.
So we reframed the goal: not more views, but more visitors who leave convinced enough to get in touch.
Our approach
1. Diagnosing the trust gap
We combined quantitative data (where visitors came from, what they read, where they left) with qualitative research into how they perceived the fund. The pattern was consistent: people were interested in the strategy but wanted evidence, and the site offered mostly opinions.
2. Ideas ranked by impact
We generated a long list of ways to build credibility, from content formats to tools, and prioritised them by expected impact. Two ideas came out on top because they let visitors verify the claims themselves instead of being asked to believe them.
3. A calculator that creates ownership
The first was an interactive investment calculator. Visitors choose an amount and a period and see what that investment would have returned in the fund. It uses the "IKEA effect": people value what they help build. Someone who has just worked out their own scenario no longer reads a claim; they look at their own result.
4. Radical transparency
The second was a landing page built on the fund's real historical performance. Real data instead of claims is what made the message believable. The page links directly to the calculator and to a clear next step for visitors who want to talk.
5. From engagement to leads
Both tools were connected to lead capture, so interest could turn into a conversation at the moment it was highest. Everything went live within three months.
The outcome
Visitors spent more time on the site, used the calculator and were more likely to leave their details. The performance page became a lead generation tool in its own right. Trust improved, more visitors became clients, and the way people saw the fund shifted from scepticism to engagement.
Key takeaways
When trust is the problem, more content is rarely the answer. Evidence is.
Let people test claims themselves: interaction turns doubt into ownership.
Show real data. Transparency is more convincing than any claim.
Measure the goal behind the request: "more views" was really "more believers".
Related Articles


